2026-10-23 US West Coast
HCM-UWC 8,174 USD/FEU -4.56% Index 3,983 pts
2026-10-23 US East Coast
HCM-UEC 11,055 USD/FEU -1.64% Index 3,383 pts
2026-10-23 Northern Europe
HCM-NEU 3,883 USD/FEU +14.87% Index 2,672 pts
2026-10-23 Mediterranean
HCM-MED 4,226 USD/FEU +3.89% Index 2,309 pts
2026-10-23 China
HCM-CHN 86 USD/FEU -0.01% Index 1,012 pts
2026-10-23 Korea
HCM-KOR 354 USD/FEU +10.18% Index 1,186 pts
2026-10-23 Japan
HCM-JPN 526 USD/FEU +0.05% Index 1,699 pts
2026-10-23 Southeast Asia
HCM-SEA 339 USD/FEU -0.29% Index 1,735 pts
2026-10-23 Oceania
HCM-ANZ 4,811 USD/FEU -3.71% Index 7,613 pts
2026-10-23 Middle East
HCM-MEA Suspended
2026-10-23 South America
HCM-SAM 5,519 USD/FEU -6.92% Index 3,448 pts
2026-10-23 South Africa
HCM-ZAF 4,939 USD/FEU +3.36% Index 2,807 pts
2026-10-23 East & West Africa
HCM-EWA 5,249 USD/FEU +2.70% Index 1,337 pts
2026-10-23 Global
VCFI Composite Rate 5,141 USD/FEU -2.21% VCFI Composite Index 3,553 pts -1.89%
2026-10-23 US West Coast
HCM-UWC 8,174 USD/FEU -4.56% Index 3,983 pts
2026-10-23 US East Coast
HCM-UEC 11,055 USD/FEU -1.64% Index 3,383 pts
2026-10-23 Northern Europe
HCM-NEU 3,883 USD/FEU +14.87% Index 2,672 pts
2026-10-23 Mediterranean
HCM-MED 4,226 USD/FEU +3.89% Index 2,309 pts
2026-10-23 China
HCM-CHN 86 USD/FEU -0.01% Index 1,012 pts
2026-10-23 Korea
HCM-KOR 354 USD/FEU +10.18% Index 1,186 pts
2026-10-23 Japan
HCM-JPN 526 USD/FEU +0.05% Index 1,699 pts
2026-10-23 Southeast Asia
HCM-SEA 339 USD/FEU -0.29% Index 1,735 pts
2026-10-23 Oceania
HCM-ANZ 4,811 USD/FEU -3.71% Index 7,613 pts
2026-10-23 Middle East
HCM-MEA Suspended
2026-10-23 South America
HCM-SAM 5,519 USD/FEU -6.92% Index 3,448 pts
2026-10-23 South Africa
HCM-ZAF 4,939 USD/FEU +3.36% Index 2,807 pts
2026-10-23 East & West Africa
HCM-EWA 5,249 USD/FEU +2.70% Index 1,337 pts
2026-10-23 Global
VCFI Composite Rate 5,141 USD/FEU -2.21% VCFI Composite Index 3,553 pts -1.89%
Select service type

Sunday, 06/09/2020, 22:58 (GMT +7)

1159

Why Maersk axed Safmarine and Damco — and what’s next

World’s largest container line reorganizes. Will its multibrand strategy survive?

Maersk-and-Safmarine

 

When A.P. Moller-Maersk, the world’s largest container-line owner, announces layoffs in the middle of a pandemic, the immediate reaction is: They’re cutting staff and slashing costs to pump up profits. As the saying goes: “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

Not true, maintained company representatives speaking with FreightWaves.

The reorganization announced Tuesday was in the works long before the coronavirus struck. “This is not about cost savings whatsoever. It’s about being more efficient with customers,” asserted a Maersk Line spokesman.

Major changes announced

Maersk announced Tuesday that it was closing its Safmarine ocean brand at the end of this year and integrating that business into Maersk Line. South Africa’s Safmarine was founded in 1946. Maersk purchased the company in 1999.

Maersk is also retiring its Damco brand at the end of this year. Damco traces its roots to a predecessor Dutch company founded in 1918; it later became part of P&O Nedlloyd. Maersk purchased P&O in 2005. Damco provides air cargo and less-than-container-load (LCL) freight forwarding. The Maersk group’s logistics division will take over those services.

How many job losses?

Maersk will keep other brands, such as Hamburg Sud and SeaLand. However, there will be changes: Maersk and Hamburg Sud back offices “will come closer together.”

Danish newspaper Borsen pegged potential job losses at 3,400: 2,300 at Damco and 1,100 at Safmarine. Other outlets quoted Borsen’s numbers. CNBC and Fox Business quoted a Maersk spokesperson as saying that 26,000-27,000 employees “would be affected” by the reoganization. Maersk has around 80,000 total employees. Jefferies analyst David Kerstens used the Borsen numbers to estimate that headcount cuts could result in $200 million in annual savings.

But these early estimates are problematic. “Affected” does not mean “laid off.” And even the 3,400 figure looks high. FreightWaves was told that this is the total number of employees at Damco and Safmarine and there are plans to retain some of them.

“Maersk is not disclosing any figures at this point in time,” said the Maersk spokesperson. There are work councils (labor unions) in several of the countries affected, as well as other issues, meaning that the final count may not be known for another month.  

In an email to employees that was obtained by FreightWaves, Maersk CEO of Ocean and Logistics Vincent Clerc said “it is not to say goodbye to skilled and dedicated employees, but, regrettably, it is a consequence of the integration.” The goal is to finalize job cuts by Oct. 1, he wrote.

Reorg timing

It seems logical to assume that a global health and economic crisis would lead to belt-tightening. U.S. and European corporations are making big job cuts in the second half of this year.

But Maersk is actually doing extremely well amid the COVID-19 crisis, with second-quarter profits almost triple those of the same period last year.

According to the Maersk spokesperson, the virus did not spur the reorganization, although it did affect the timing of its implementation.

“This process actually started in October of last year,” he explained. “It’s not a short-term cost-savings exercise. This is about Maersk’s vision of being a global integrator for container logistics. This is about fine-tuning things and making it easier for customers across their supply chains, because there will be fewer ‘touch points’ for them.

“This was originally planned to be rolled out in May. But with the pandemic and so much uncertainty in the marketplace, it was not the right time, so we waited until September,” he said.

In other words, the timing of the announcement is not a negative reflection on market conditions, but a positive one. The group is not further battening down the hatches. It is weathering the storm and now confident enough with current conditions to forge ahead with structural corporate changes.

“We have a solid foundation and we strongly believe that it is the right time to take the next big leap towards customer-centricity,” Clerc told employees.

Rationale for ends to Safmarine, Damco

Clerc described the company changes as “deep and profound” and laid out the two tenets driving the moves. “Everything we do should be guided by two fundamental questions: How do we create the most value for our customers and how do we deliver most efficiently the products and solutions they buy from us? This should permeate all of our decisions.”

Asked about the decision to end the Safmarine brand, the Maersk spokesperson responded, “So much of the Safmarine network is really a Maersk network, so from an ocean-product perspective it made perfect sense. Safmarine is very good at customer service and the customer experience, so Maersk would be keeping a lot of Safmarine talent as a result. It’s just that from a pure liner-network perspective, there’s duplicate activities.”

The press release also stated that the “value propositions” of Maersk and Safmarine converged “as the digital interactions with customers have increased.”

Regarding the takeover of Damco’s air cargo and ocean LCL freight forwarding, Maersk said “it has become apparent through close customer engagements that the value proposition of Maersk can be greatly enhanced with the expansion of multiple modes of transport.”

Hamburg Sud changes

Maersk bought Hamburg Sud in 2017. The group has already obtained substantial back-office synergies. What’s new following the reorg?

Hamburg Sud spokesperson Rainer Horn told FreightWaves, “After we became part of the Maersk family, we integrated the operational side: container fleets, container maintenance, stowage planning, port stuff, procurement. All non-customer-facing functions where you can reap all the synergies. That was quite successful. 

“Now what we [Maersk and Hamburg Sud] will do is work together more closely on the commercial side,” Horn said. “But again, not for the customer-facing part. That will stay Hamburg Sud [and Maersk] to the customers and the teams won’t change.

“But in the background [in the commercial back office] you will have more alignment and people working closer together,” he continued. One example: Maersk divides the world into six regions, Hamburg Sud five. Regions will be aligned and each brand’s regional teams can work together better.

 

Will multibrand strategy survive?


The retirement of the Safmarine name comes on the heels of CMA CGM’s decision to cease using the APL brand name in the trans-Pacific market.

“This might be a sign that the times of managing multi-brand strategies on the major deep-sea trades is slowly coming to an end,” wrote SeaIntelligence Consulting CEO Lars Jensen in an online post on Tuesday. “If this is indeed [the case], it of course raises the question as to not only the long-term future of the Hamburg Sud brand, but also …. COSCO’s long-term plans with OOCL.”

Maersk itself confirmed that increased digital interactions with customers had decreased the differentiation value of Safmarine’s brand. Why wouldn’t the same be true for brands like Hamburg Sud, particularly given Maersk’s comments during the latest quarterly call on its surge in online bookings?

“Maersk doesn’t want to close Hamburg Sud as a brand,” affirmed Horn. “Maersk’s multibrand approach is that you can cover a wider range of the market with several brands than with only one. Take the largest car maker in the world, Volkswagen. They have Audi, Volkswagen, Porsche, Lamborghini, Bentley — a brand for each niche in the market.

“Hamburg Sud is in some parts of the world a niche player; in other parts, like Brazil, a market leader.”

Brand strength

“It’s a very strong brand. In the year when Hamburg Sud was sold, its volume increased 5%. That’s because of the loyalty of our customers. Usually a company loses 10-15% of its volume in a merger and acquisition, because the competition is after your customers. The fact that we increased our volume during a takeover is like a miracle.

“Our customers appreciate our very personal service. They have known our salespeople and customer service people for years,” said Horn.

 

Source: FreightWaves 

       

About the Author
See more
1082
FCL
Ho Chi Minh, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
12 Days
Nhava Sheva, Maharashtra, India
Freight cost
62,849,625₫
/ 20GP

Compass Logistics

Membership Icon Premium
1953
FCL
Hai Phong, Hai Phong, Vietnam
12 Days
Inchon, South Korea
Freight cost
7,651,200₫
/ 40HQ

ASIAN EXPRESS LINE VIETNAM ( AEL VIET NAM )

2996
FCL
Ningbo, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
6 Days
Hai Phong, Hai Phong, Vietnam
Freight cost
23,229,000₫
/ 40GP

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN TIẾP VẬN INTERCARGO

3817
FCL
Xiamen, Xiamen, Fujian, China
5 Days
Ho Chi Minh (Cat Lai), Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Freight cost
18,524,100₫
/ 20GP

CÔNG TY TNHH VẬN CHUYỂN QUỐC TẾ N.B.L

4219
FCL
Mundra, Gujarat, India
20 Days
Ho Chi Minh (Cat Lai), Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Freight cost
10,585,200₫
/ 40HQ

N.B.L INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT CO., LTD

Find Freight Rates
Find a logistics company
Find Warehouse / Factory
Services type:

Origin

Destination

Container type

Origin

Destination

Weight (KG)

Volume (m³)

Services type:

Origin

Destination

Container type

Origin

Destination

Weight (KG)

Volume (m³)

Services type:

Origin

Destination

Container type

Origin

Destination

Weight (KG)

Volume (m³)

Services type:

Origin

Destination

Container type

Origin

Destination

Weight (KG)

Volume (m³)

Search

Select service type

Type

Location

Acreage

Price to rent

Why do thousands of businesses trust Phaata?

Phaata helps businesses find the right logistics providers, easily compare options, and connect directly to optimize costs and time.
100000+

USERS/MONTH

30000+

LOGISTICS COMPANIES

10000+

REQUEST FOR QUOTEŚ

1300+

QUOTATIONS

#1

VIETNAM LOGISTICS COMMUNITY

5 Steps to Get the Best Quote

1

Find a price quickly/Send a RFQ

2

Compare multiple options

3

Contact for Further Consultation

4

Negotiating prices/services

5

Management & rating

Send One Request – Receive Multiple Quotes

Sea freight - FCL

See more
151
Ho Chi Minh i
9 Days Transit
Jakarta i
  • ₫4,895,655 / 20'GP
  • ₫8,997,420 / 40'GP
  • ₫8,997,420 / 40'HQ
  • ₫10,452,885 / 45'HQ

MELODY LOGISTICS COMPANY LIMITED

View detail
168
Shanghai i
5 Days Direct
Hai Phong i
  • ₫15,660,000 / 20'GP

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN TIẾP VẬN INTERCARGO

View detail
160
Xiamen i
4 Days Direct
Ho Chi Minh (Cat Lai) i
  • ₫15,760,250 / 20'GP
  • ₫32,562,500 / 40'GP
  • ₫32,562,500 / 40'HQ

N.B.L INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT CO., LTD

View detail
159
Penang i
5 Days Direct
Ho Chi Minh (Cat Lai) i
  • ₫2,117,040 / 20'GP

CÔNG TY TNHH VẬN CHUYỂN QUỐC TẾ TÂN TOÀN CẦU

View detail
114
Ho Chi Minh i
12 Days Transit
Melbourne i
  • ₫60,864,900 / 20'GP

Compass Logistics

Membership Icon Premium
View detail

Sea freight - LCL

See more
2,309
Ho Chi Minh i
13 Days Direct
Chennai i
  • ₫0 /cbm

CÔNG TY TNHH DỊCH VỤ VẬN TẢI BIỂN VESTAL

View detail
3,253
Ningbo i
5 Days Direct
Hai Phong (Cua Cam Port) i
  • ₫26,463 /cbm

CÔNG TY TNHH T&M FORWARDING - CHI NHÁNH HÀ NỘI

View detail
4,536
Ho Chi Minh (Cat Lai) i
3 Days Direct
Klang i
  • Refund ₫926,205 /cbm

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN GIAO NHẬN VẬN TẢI HỒNG SƠN

View detail
5,015
Ho Chi Minh (Cat Lai) i
5 Days Direct
Klang i
  • ₫211,704 /cbm

Công ty TNHH T&M Forwarding

View detail
4,182
Ho Chi Minh (Cat Lai) i
3 Days Direct
Klang i
  • ₫132,315 /cbm

CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN DT LOGISTICS (VN)

View detail

Air freight - General cargo

See more
5,222
Hong Kong(HKG) i
1 Days Direct
Hanoi(HAN) i
  • 46,310 ₫/kg

N.B.L INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT CO., LTD

View detail
6,810
Hanoi(HAN) i
1 Days Direct
Nagoya(NGO) i
  • 161,424 ₫/kg

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN GIAO NHẬN VẬN TẢI HỒNG SƠN

View detail
9,312
Ho Chi Minh(SGN) i
10 Days Transit
Chicago(ORD) i
  • 264,630 ₫/kg

Phoenix Logistics Vietnam - chi nhánh TP. Hồ Chí Minh (Phoenix International Forwarding Vietnam )

View detail
10,858
Hanoi(HAN) i
1 Days Direct
Hyderabad(BPM) i
  • 185,241 ₫/kg

CÔNG TY TNHH THƯƠNG MẠI VÀ DỊCH VỤ FASTRANS

View detail
9,781
Hanoi(HAN) i
1 Days Direct
London(LHR) i
  • 26,463 ₫/kg

Globexair Ltd

View detail

Rail freight - FCL

See more
6,553
Ha Noi i
5 Days Direct
Shanghai i
  • ₫44,987,100 / 40'HQ
  • ₫44,987,100 / 45'HQ

CÔNG TY TNHH PHƯỚC TÁ

View detail
9,177
Dong Nai (Trang Bom Station) i
3 Days Direct
Da Nang (Kim Lien Station) i
  • ₫15,083,910 / 40'HQ

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN VẬN TẢI VÀ THƯƠNG MẠI ĐƯỜNG SẮT

View detail
19,094
Qingdao i
7 Days Direct
Ha Noi (Hanoi Station) i
  • ₫48,956,550 / 20'GP

Công ty TNHH T&M Forwarding

View detail
17,708
Qingdao i
5 Days Direct
Ha Noi (Hanoi Station) i
  • ₫7,145,010 / 20'GP

ASIAN EXPRESS LINE VIETNAM ( AEL VIET NAM )

View detail
10,704
Qingdao i
10 Days Direct
Ha Noi (Hanoi Station) i
  • ₫9,262,050 / 20'GP

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN LOGISTICS QUỐC TẾ V&T

View detail

Road freight - FCL

See more
2,482
Ho Chi Minh i
4 Day
Ho Chi Minh (Cat Lai) i
  • ₫5,000,000 / 40'GP

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN IGAP

View detail
9,613
Ha Noi i
1 Day
Ho Chi Minh i
  • ₫28,000,000 / 20'GP
  • ₫28,000,000 / 40'GP

CÔNG TY TNHH THƯƠNG MẠI DỊCH VỤ VÀ KHO VẬN VIETTEL POST - TTC

View detail
110,506
Ho Chi Minh i
2 Day
Tay Ninh i
  • ₫6,500,000 / 40'RF
  • ₫6,500,000 / 40'RQ
  • ₫6,500,000 / 45'RQ

CÔNG TY CP PROSHIP

Membership Icon Premium
View detail
178,907
Ho Chi Minh i
1 Day
Phnom Penh i
  • ₫18,997,200 / 20'GP
  • ₫18,997,200 / 40'GP

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN GIAO NHẬN VẬN TẢI CON ONG

View detail
266,584
Nancheng(Dongguan) i
3 Day
Ha Noi i
  • ₫32,000,000 / 20'GP
  • ₫64,000,000 / 40'GP
  • ₫64,000,000 / 40'HQ
  • ₫64,000,000 / 45'HQ

Công ty Cổ phần phát triển thương mại Thuận Đạt Việt Nam

View detail

Freight rates

Help you find instant freight rates with just a few clicks.

See more

Request For Quotes

Help you send and receive quotes from Forwarders on the market quickly and efficiently.

See more

HOT Services

Help you quickly find Hot services being promoted on the market.

See more

Find Forwarders

Helps you easily find and choose the most suitable logistics service provider

See more

Warehouse

Helps you easily find and choose the most suitable logistics service provider

See more

Home

Send request

Find rates