- All
- Market news
- Knowledge
- Brands
- Events
- Freight rates
- Zip code
- Glossary
- Industrial park
Friday, 19/09/2025, 13:05 (GMT +7)
The Growing Cost Burden of Empty Repositioning for Ocean Carriers
.webp)
Container vessel (Photo: Maritimegateway)
The fact that global container volumes have remained above 16 million TEU for three consecutive months has led to a less-noticed consequence: a parallel rise in the movement of empty containers. And while the cost of repositioning empties has always been a challenge for carriers, the Red Sea crisis has caused these costs to increase significantly.
New research from consultancy Sea-Intelligence shows that since 2019, the share of empty container movements within the total number of container shipments has been growing at a faster rate than that of full containers.
Based on TEU-miles – a metric that accounts for travel distance – Sea-Intelligence found that empty containers accounted for a full 41% of all container movements in July, a sharp increase from 31% at the beginning of 2019.
However, Sea-Intelligence argues that this rising share is primarily due to growing trade imbalances during this period, rather than the Red Sea crisis itself.
"The trend is relatively unaffected by the Red Sea crisis," the Sea-Intelligence report states. "Basically, indicating that the shifting of trade imbalances is relatively evenly split across trades which are, and are not, impacted by the Red Sea crisis."
The consultancy further explained: "The present situation is that for every 10 miles a full container is shipped, there is now a need to ship an empty container 4.1 miles - sharply up from "just" 3.1 miles in 2019, before the pandemic market disruptions."
.webp)
Source: Sea-Intelligence
The Real Impact of the Red Sea Crisis
So where has the Red Sea crisis had an impact? It is in the total distance that empty containers must travel, which has increased by 20% since the Houthi attacks began.
"Clearly, the Red Sea crisis has made a strong impact on the average sailing distance for an empty container, showing that it is not just a relative increase versus the full loads, but also an additional absolute increase in the work needed," said Sea-Intelligence. "Consequently, the data also clearly illustrates an increasing cost pressure related to the movement of full containers, as the empty movement costs will have to be allocated to the full containers."
This places carriers in a dilemma. On one hand, the Red Sea crisis helps absorb a large amount of vessel capacity, which helps to prop up freight rates that might otherwise have collapsed. On the other hand, it increases the cost of repositioning empty containers. This may be one reason why CMA CGM has been keen to send its vessels through the Suez Canal on backhaul voyages when they deem it safe.
For other carriers, there is a "silver lining" in that whenever the Suez Canal fully reopens, although they will face a potential capacity shock, at least the cost of repositioning empty containers will decrease.
See more:
- Korea Shipowners' Association Voices Opposition to POSCO's HMM Takeover Plan
- Yang Ming Expands 'Green Fleet' with Newbuild Contract for 7 LNG-Powered Vessels
- UPS Bolsters Intra-Asia Air Network, Doubling Capacity on Vietnam-China Route
- More Than 4 Out of Every 10 Containers Shipped Are Empty
- International Shipping and Logistics Market Update - Week 37/2025 | Phaata
- FedEx Announces 5.9% Rate and Surcharge Increase for 2026
- Shipping Market Update (Week 37/2025): Dry Bulk Positive, Tankers Volatile, Containers Stabilize
- Red Sea 2025: To Transit or Divert – The Maritime Industry's Conundrum
- Asia-U.S. Container Rates Face Heavy Downward Pressure for Second Half of the Year
- Major Maritime Incident at Port of Long Beach: 67 Containers Lost Overboard During Unloading
- Container Line Profits Plunged in Q2 2025
- Golden Week 2025: Market Braces for Last-Minute Blank Sailings on the Transpacific
- COSCO schedules: Vietnam - North America in Sep 2025
- COSCO updates Vietnam-North Europe sailing schedules in Sep 2025
- SITC updates Vietnam-Intra Asia sailing schedules in Sep 2025
Source: Phaata.com (According to Sea-Intelligence / The Load Star)
► Find Better Freight Rates & Logistics Service Providers!
Featured News
- Hapag-Lloyd applies Peak Season Surcharge from East Asia to USA and Canada
- The world\'s largest container ships MSC Irina and MSC Loreto floated
- MSC (Mediterranean Shipping Company) - The world\'s leading container shipping lines
- Information you need to know about Maersk Line
- Top 10 export and import goods between Vietnam - Philippines in the first 5 months of 2020
Market News
See more
HOT PROMO
See more
FCL
45 Days
Compass Logistics
Premium
FCL
40 Days
CÔNG TY TNHH PEGASHIP
FCL
30 Days
CÔNG TY TNHH INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS GLORY (VIỆT NAM)
FCL
3 Days
Công ty TNHH Giao nhận vận chuyển Quốc tế Trường Hải - THILOGI
Premium
FCL
10 Days
CÔNG TY TNHH THƯƠNG MẠI VÀ DỊCH VỤ GREEN DRAGON VIỆT NAM
Why do thousands of businesses trust Phaata?
USERS/MONTH
LOGISTICS COMPANIES
REQUEST FOR QUOTEŚ
QUOTATIONS
VIETNAM LOGISTICS COMMUNITY
5 Steps to Get the Best Quote
Find a price quickly/Send a RFQ
Compare multiple options
Contact for Further Consultation
Negotiating prices/services
Management & rating
Freight rates
Sea freight
- FCL
See more
25
Days Transit
- ₫30,432,450 / 20'GP
- ₫38,371,350 / 40'GP
- ₫38,371,350 / 40'HQ
- ₫38,371,350 / 45'HQ
T.H.I GROUP VIỆT NAM
8
Days Direct
- ₫34,087,300 / 40'HQ
CÔNG TY TNHH VẬN TẢI VÀ TIẾP VẬN TOÀN CẦU
5
Days Direct
- ₫44,540,000 / 40'HQ
CÔNG TY TNHH INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS GLORY (VIỆT NAM)
6
Days Direct
- ₫3,175,560 / 20'GP
- ₫5,821,860 / 40'GP
ORIENTAL LOGISTICS VIETNAM CO., LTD
Sea freight
- LCL
See more
4
Days Direct
- ₫26,463 /cbm
CÔNG TY TNHH IEC EXPRESS (VIỆT NAM)- CHI NHÁNH HÀ NỘI
5
Days Direct
- ₫26,463 /cbm
CHI NHÁNH TẠI THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH - CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN MG LOGISTICS
8
Days Direct
- Refund ₫2,362,500 /cbm
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN TIẾP VẬN INTERCARGO
4
Days Direct
- ₫26,463 /cbm
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN GIAO NHẬN VẬN TẢI MỸ Á (ASL LOGISTICS)
Air freight
- General cargo
See more
10
Days Transit
- 264,630 ₫/kg
Phoenix Logistics Vietnam - chi nhánh TP. Hồ Chí Minh (Phoenix International Forwarding Vietnam )
1
Days Direct
- 185,241 ₫/kg
CÔNG TY TNHH THƯƠNG MẠI VÀ DỊCH VỤ FASTRANS
8
Days Transit
- 224,936 ₫/kg
CÔNG TY TNHH SEA GLOBAL VIỆT NAM
1
Days Direct
- 502,797 ₫/kg
CÔNG TY TNHH VẬN TẢI QUỐC TẾ GIA PHÚ
Rail freight
- FCL
See more
5
Days Direct
- ₫26,463,000 / 40'HQ
- ₫26,463,000 / 45'HQ
CÔNG TY TNHH PHƯỚC TÁ
3
Days Direct
- ₫6,324,657 / 40'HQ
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN VẬN TẢI VÀ THƯƠNG MẠI ĐƯỜNG SẮT
7
Days Direct
- ₫48,956,550 / 20'GP
Công ty TNHH T&M Forwarding
5
Days Direct
- ₫7,145,010 / 20'GP
ASIAN EXPRESS LINE VIETNAM ( AEL VIET NAM )
10
Days Direct
- ₫9,262,050 / 20'GP
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN LOGISTICS QUỐC TẾ V&T
Road freight
- FCL
See more
1
Day
- ₫6,868,686 / 20'OT
- ₫6,868,686 / 40'OT
- ₫6,868,686 / 40'OT HQ
CÔNG TY TNHH LIÊN VẬN QUỐC TẾ SHINING OCEAN VIỆT NAM
2
Day
- ₫6,500,000 / 40'RF
- ₫6,500,000 / 40'RQ
- ₫6,500,000 / 45'RQ
CÔNG TY CP PROSHIP
Premium
1
Day
- ₫18,997,200 / 20'GP
- ₫18,997,200 / 40'GP
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN GIAO NHẬN VẬN TẢI CON ONG
3
Day
- ₫32,000,000 / 20'GP
- ₫64,000,000 / 40'GP
- ₫64,000,000 / 40'HQ
- ₫64,000,000 / 45'HQ
Công ty Cổ phần phát triển thương mại Thuận Đạt Việt Nam
3
Day
- ₫58,047,000 / 45'HQ
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN ĐẦU TƯ VÀ GIAO NHẬN THÁI HÀ