- All
- Market news
- Knowledge
- Brands
- Events
- Freight rates
- Zip code
- Glossary
- Industrial park
Saturday, 21/03/2026, 11:58 (GMT +7)
Port Dispute: Panamanian President Rejects Hutchison's Accusations
.webp)
The legal and diplomatic battle between China, Panama, and the CK Hutchison conglomerate is escalating. During a press conference on Thursday, Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino officially dismissed accusations from Panama Ports Company (PPC) and CK Hutchison regarding Panama's cancellation of the Chinese company's concession contract for the Balboa and Cristobal ports.
Tensions on the Legal Front
Earlier this week, PPC claimed that Panama missed the filing deadline for international arbitration, citing the country's lack of an international legal team. Firing back, President Mulino dismissed the accusation, calling it "outrageous and a lie."
He affirmed that Panama has appointed international lawyers to defend against PPC's claims, amidst the company's demands for at least $2 billion in damages.
PPC and China have repeatedly accused Panama of acting illegally and failing to respect the contract. PPC further alleged that Panama broke into a storage archive, confiscated proprietary documents, and refused to return them.
Responding to the media, President Mulino emphasized that the company's recent statements are "fallacious and libelous."
Background of the Port Concession Revocation
The incident stems from February, when Panama revoked the operating rights for both terminals following a final ruling by the Supreme Court. The court declared that the laws establishing the 1997 concession contract and its 25-year no-bid extension in 2021 were unconstitutional. This lawsuit was initiated by the Comptroller General of the Republic after an audit uncovered numerous irregularities.
Panama alleges that the state lost up to $1.2 billion in revenue due to irregularities, shortfalls in payments, and tax exemptions. Conversely, Hutchison asserts that it invested at least $1.7 billion throughout the concession period to modernize and operate the terminals at both ends of the Panama Canal, as well as to train the workforce.
Temporary Operational Solutions and Geopolitical Implications
According to media reports, Panama has launched a new investigation into the enterprise following the port revocation. Currently, the government has awarded temporary operating contracts to Maersk's APM Terminals and MSC's Terminal Investment Limited (TiL) to manage the terminals until a new bidding process can be organized. Reports indicate that both terminals are operating normally and at maximum capacity following a seamless handover.
While PPC and Hutchison claim they requested discussions to resolve the issue and accused Panama of conducting a year-long campaign against the company, Panama asserted on Thursday that it was the company that refused to cooperate, concealed information, and obstructed coordination processes.
Hutchison announced it will continue to pursue all legal avenues against Panama, and the international arbitration is expected to drag on for years. On its part, China has retaliated by urging other companies to cease trading with the Central American nation.
In stark contrast, the US has backed Panama's revocation of the terminals. Last year, Donald Trump repeatedly stated that China was operating the Panama Canal and called for action, warning that otherwise, the US would retake control of the waterway.
See more:
- Hapag-Lloyd and India Establish a Strategic Maritime Cooperation Framework
- MSC Group Inks Deal to Acquire 50% Stake in Sinokor Maritime
- The Future of the ZIM Deal: Regulatory Hurdles for Hapag-Lloyd and Maersk's Contingency Plan
- Hormuz Shock: Over 204,000 TEUs at Risk of Being 'Trapped', Specter of Empty Container Shortages Returns to Asia
- CMA CGM's Pivot: Repatriating Fleet Under the French Flag as a Billion-Dollar US Pledge Remains in Limbo
- International Shipping and Logistics Market Update Week 11/2026 | Phaata
- February Tanker Market Review
- Asia-US Freight Rates Heat Up: US Considers Jones Act Waiver as FMC Scrutinizes Carrier Surcharges
- Gulf Crisis: Maersk and MSC Suspend Routes, Freight Costs Face Threat of Skyrocketing
- Maersk Implements Sweeping Peak Season Surcharges Across Multiple Key Trade Lanes
- Maersk Suspends Cargo Bookings Across Multiple Gulf Nations Amid Hormuz Blockade Crisis
- India: 95% of Trade Dependent on Foreign Fleets and the Ambition to Turn the Tide
- West Asia Tensions: Indian Exporters and Shipping Lines in Heated Standoff Over 'War Surcharges'
- Tanger Med Port Rises to Strategic Hub Status Amid Global Maritime Crisis
- Rate Volatility: CMA CGM Announces Sweeping Adjustments to FAK Rates and Peak Season Surcharges Across Major Trade Lanes
- COSCO schedules: Vietnam - North America in Mar 2026
- SITC updates Vietnam-Intra Asia sailing schedules in Mar 2026
Source: Phaata.com (According to Maritime-Executive)
► Find Better Freight Rates & Logistics Service Providers!
Featured News
- Hapag-Lloyd applies Peak Season Surcharge from East Asia to USA and Canada
- The world\'s largest container ships MSC Irina and MSC Loreto floated
- MSC (Mediterranean Shipping Company) - The world\'s leading container shipping lines
- Information you need to know about Maersk Line
- Top 10 export and import goods between Vietnam - Philippines in the first 5 months of 2020
Market News
See more
HOT PROMO
See more
FCL
31 Days
CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN DT LOGISTICS (VN)
FCL
30 Days
CÔNG TY TNHH PEGASHIP
FCL
45 Days
Compass Logistics
Premium
FCL
30 Days
CÔNG TY TNHH INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS GLORY (VIỆT NAM)
FCL
3 Days
Công ty TNHH Giao nhận vận chuyển Quốc tế Trường Hải - THILOGI
Premium
Why do thousands of businesses trust Phaata?
USERS/MONTH
LOGISTICS COMPANIES
REQUEST FOR QUOTEŚ
QUOTATIONS
VIETNAM LOGISTICS COMMUNITY
5 Steps to Get the Best Quote
Find a price quickly/Send a RFQ
Compare multiple options
Contact for Further Consultation
Negotiating prices/services
Management & rating
Freight rates
Sea freight
- FCL
See more
3
Days Direct
- ₫793,890 / 20'GP
- ₫1,058,520 / 40'GP
- ₫1,058,520 / 40'HQ
BLUE OCEAN INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT
22
Days Direct
- ₫182,594,700 / 20'GP
CÔNG TY TNHH NGUYÊN ĐĂNG VIỆT NAM
40
Days Transit
- ₫201,424,300 / 40'HQ
CÔNG TY TNHH VẬN TẢI VÀ TIẾP VẬN TOÀN CẦU
6
Days Direct
- ₫35,725,050 / 40'HQ
CÔNG TY TNHH ENSIGN LOGISTICS (VIỆT NAM)
Sea freight
- LCL
See more
7
Days Direct
- ₫105,852 /cbm
Công ty Cổ phần vận tải xuyên đại dương OVC
4
Days Direct
- ₫26,463 /cbm
CÔNG TY TNHH IEC EXPRESS (VIỆT NAM)- CHI NHÁNH HÀ NỘI
5
Days Direct
- ₫26,463 /cbm
CHI NHÁNH TẠI THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH - CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN MG LOGISTICS
8
Days Direct
- Refund ₫2,362,500 /cbm
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN TIẾP VẬN INTERCARGO
4
Days Direct
- ₫26,463 /cbm
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN GIAO NHẬN VẬN TẢI MỸ Á (ASL LOGISTICS)
Air freight
- General cargo
See more
10
Days Transit
- 264,630 ₫/kg
Phoenix Logistics Vietnam - chi nhánh TP. Hồ Chí Minh (Phoenix International Forwarding Vietnam )
1
Days Direct
- 185,241 ₫/kg
CÔNG TY TNHH THƯƠNG MẠI VÀ DỊCH VỤ FASTRANS
8
Days Transit
- 224,936 ₫/kg
CÔNG TY TNHH SEA GLOBAL VIỆT NAM
1
Days Direct
- 502,797 ₫/kg
CÔNG TY TNHH VẬN TẢI QUỐC TẾ GIA PHÚ
Rail freight
- FCL
See more
4
Days Direct
- ₫18,815,193 / 40'HQ
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN VẬN TẢI VÀ THƯƠNG MẠI ĐƯỜNG SẮT
5
Days Direct
- ₫26,463,000 / 40'HQ
- ₫26,463,000 / 45'HQ
CÔNG TY TNHH PHƯỚC TÁ
7
Days Direct
- ₫48,956,550 / 20'GP
Công ty TNHH T&M Forwarding
5
Days Direct
- ₫7,145,010 / 20'GP
ASIAN EXPRESS LINE VIETNAM ( AEL VIET NAM )
10
Days Direct
- ₫9,262,050 / 20'GP
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN LOGISTICS QUỐC TẾ V&T
Road freight
- FCL
See more
1
Day
- ₫6,868,686 / 20'OT
- ₫6,868,686 / 40'OT
- ₫6,868,686 / 40'OT HQ
CÔNG TY TNHH LIÊN VẬN QUỐC TẾ SHINING OCEAN VIỆT NAM
2
Day
- ₫6,500,000 / 40'RF
- ₫6,500,000 / 40'RQ
- ₫6,500,000 / 45'RQ
CÔNG TY CP PROSHIP
Premium
1
Day
- ₫18,997,200 / 20'GP
- ₫18,997,200 / 40'GP
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN GIAO NHẬN VẬN TẢI CON ONG
3
Day
- ₫32,000,000 / 20'GP
- ₫64,000,000 / 40'GP
- ₫64,000,000 / 40'HQ
- ₫64,000,000 / 45'HQ
Công ty Cổ phần phát triển thương mại Thuận Đạt Việt Nam
3
Day
- ₫58,047,000 / 45'HQ
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN ĐẦU TƯ VÀ GIAO NHẬN THÁI HÀ